Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bradleyg_'s commentslogin

Does it fix the terrible backlight on the F-91W though..


The old Illuminator model has a much better backlight. https://www.amazon.com/Casio-F105W-1A-Illuminator-Sport-Watc...


The G shocks have the same new abysmal backlight.

I bought one with a slick (new) dark red face....which lights up bright pink from the one white LED on the left side of the face.

Even in the marketing/landing page for this watch which is linked in post.....they show the backlight feature, looking like it's missing an LED.


If it's the same movement as the ABL-100WE, I think it may.

The ABL-100WE has an orange light that stays on for either 1.5 or 3 seconds (configurable) and provides some decent light.

The display contrast doesn't seem to be quite as good as it used to be with older movements, though.


Well played Cloudflare.


Blocked in Europe, here's an archive - https://archive.is/PWZvN


You can use netlify-plugin-nextjs - https://github.com/netlify/netlify-plugin-nextjs/blob/v3/doc... to host on Netlify.

And of course any regular NodeJS server works with next/image - https://nextjs.org/docs/deployment#other-hosting-options


Looks like the code is here for anybody interested. https://github.com/HermanMartinus/bearblog

Also down for me currently.. interested to know which resource was exhausted :)


I still really like main website, the admin site however could do with a total overhaul in my opinion.

I normally use http://djangosuit.com or http://grappelliproject.com but would be nice to have something good by default.


Those strike me more as reskinnings than total overhauls.

The thing about the Django admin interface is that it is very, very generic. This is the source of its power, but also the source of the problem when it comes to styling it. There's nothing to get any design traction on, because all changes have to simultaneously work on just about everything. It's a really potent example of how "generic" and "featureful" are often in direct conflict with each other.

That is to say, not that the Django admin app doesn't have features. It does, it's quite good and useful and a great generic default. But as you start trying to add more, the genericness fights you pretty hard. Django's admin interface hasn't changed because it pretty much hit the local Pareto optima that many years ago.

(And over the years, I'm developing an instinctive twitch whenever my coworkers describe something as "generic". The Django interface is one of the good exceptions, but in general I'm starting to automatically substitute "generic" with "doesn't do anything". It works better than it should.)


I don't know about generic, it's not that extensible, it can be a pain when you want to write widgets outside of what it does.

The same is true about other parts of Django. It's still quick to get things running, and there is a great ecosystem.

[EDIT] Grapelli is a great example of how not-extensible the admin is - to do something that should just be a reskin, they have to copy large parts of the admin code and then adapt it.

The admin should be built in a way so that something like grapelli is just a some new CSS. [/EDIT]


Grapelli chose not to stick to pure CSS. It's not a trade-off I think was worth it as they have no cut themselves off from much of the 3rd party admin extension ecosystem - unless those apps actively do a 'Grapelli version'

Pure CSS skins are a bit more work and you occasionally have to choose between overriding more template code than you'd like - or doing a sneak bit of jQuery DOM manipulation - but it's a better bet long term.

A really simple fix for the core Django team would be to add a heap of {% block %} tags into admin templates so that we can selectively inherit and override.


Then creating a "skip break" button would probably be a better option.


http://djangosuit.com is another great one. Would love to see an updated default though.


Yeah, now updates within the app are broken.


Been using this for a while now for Django development, it's really simplified the way I work.

When I want to start work on a project:

    fig up -d db
    fig up -d redis
    fig up web
One of the main benefits for me using fig/docker is that I only have a single VM on my machine, rather than one for each project. I usually just leave it running in the background.

Combined with docker-osx https://github.com/noplay/docker-osx I don't even need to ssh into my VM to start work.


boot2docker[1] is now the recommended environment for docker on osx, but sadly sharing files is not as easy as it is with docker-osx.

They just integrated nfs support though

[1] https://github.com/boot2docker/boot2docker


Sharing files? With Expandrive you can mount anything you can ssh into. This has been possible on Linux for a long time, Apple is lagging behind there, but Expandrive is a solid 3rd party solution.


There is also sshfs which builds on top of fuse. This is also available for Mac OS X via fuseosx, install through homebrew.


I could never make that work reliably. Could you?


You can collapse the first two to `fig up -d db redis` if you like!


Could you explain more how the VM fits into this workflow?


I imagine it has something to do with the fact that Docker requires Linux, and he's on a Mac.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: