Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fdghjkh's commentslogin

But I imagine the people buying and selling those failing bonds still took a commission


Assuming they were all purchased at retail prices, that was about $8/trade (typical bond face values are about $1000). (In reality, it was probably on the order of pennies.) I.e., not very much.


How much more money do they have than the typical employee working at one of those auto-companies? :|


So what is an 'official' TLD? One that is controlled by an American government agency?

Why can't we have our own TLDs - just like we have our own browsers and servers.


Technically ICANN isn't a US gov't agency but they do have a MOU with the DOC.


But to be fair - they have now hired another 6000 HR managers to work out why not


That's not very fair :-)


Don't worry they have set up a series of "Strategy Boutiques" (seriously!) to get over it

http://www.slideshare.net/whatidiscover/open-innovation-in-a...


Except R+D at nokia means anyone not actually bolting phones together.

Having 4 competing operating systems, each with their own layers of management and their own VPs all fighting each other - counts as R+D spend.


Four? I see S40, Symbian, and MeeGo.

Or are you counting the touch-based and non-touch-based Symbians separately? There'd be some justice in that.


Best reply I heard was an interview with a new graduate.

"We will just do what we have always done when the government fucks-up - we emigrate!"


In a nutshell, that's it. People have a sense of resignation on the whole thing. There is very little prospect of things improving any time soon. The choices would appear to be a) adjust to a lower standard of living, or b) get out.


In France the corresponding response would be:

"We will just do what we have always done when the government fucks-up - bring the country to a standstill!"


The UK spent the last 10years in a period of genuine economic growth - but still managed to increase it's national debt.

There is no limit to how much government's can spend, however they get the money!


Until 2002 it was actually going down. Then the increase was moderate and it finally exploded in the 2007 recession.


There's a great book written by a civil servant in Ireland's foreign ministry in the 80s.

He said he had two maps on his wall, one of the eastern bloc enemy and a bigger one of his minister's constituency - a crisis (eg a pothole) in the constituency was the priority.


Ha! That doesn't surprise me at all. What's the book called?

There is an appetite to reform this stuff now, but it's hard to imagine the winners of the game when played by those rules deciding to change it dramatically.


'An Accidental Diplomat'? http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1902602390


Don't remember - got stuck at Dublin airport once and it was the only book not about whiskey, your Irish ancestors or pictures of green fields


>Neither banks nor consumers should get them

Most of these are high street banks (equivalent to S+L) that were making housing loans. You want to tell pensioners that their life savings are gone and the government is not going to do anything?

It might work - but it also means people will stop putting their money into banks, which means no credit cards, no business loans, no mortgages, no saving, no insurance. So everybody will only deal in cash which means no taxes.

Admittedly ireland is probably closer to a 12th century barter economy than the rest of europe - but I don't think it really wants to go there.


Why's that positive? It means we will never get rid of the moaning buggers!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: