Composer 2.5 is really effective at some tasks, but doesn't do as well on higher complexity tasks from my own experience.

With that being said, Cursor Bench is nonetheless a fantastic gauge of LLM quality and performance. The most interesting outcome of Cursor Bench is Fable 5 to GPT 5.5, its almost a perfect continuous line. As of the report, Fable to GPT might be the new standard of agentic programming/building

I did my own rounds of tests for a lot of models.

I made multiple rounds of comparisons for issues in my open source project using Fable 5, GPT 5.5, Opus 4.8, and Composer 2.5

Made them work on various complexity issues

Here are the reports, i recommend using a Sonnet 5 or better model to summarize them because its quite a bit of information to consume across all the various tests: https://www.richkuo.com/#llm-battles

My takeaway from Composer 2.5 is that its better to use Opus or GPT for planning, and then Composer to build, use Opus/GPT to pr review, and have Composer fix findings, and loop that process. Incredibly token efficient, fast, and gets the same quality as if you worked the whole thing with Fable/Opus/GPT.

You can create your own, you get image credits on sign up, enough for two short stories or one long story.

Sorry, too lazy to make an account. Do you have a sample?

this was meant for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9905363

Personally the 'if' conditional statement acts as a visual trigger.

It allows me to quickly recognize that something may or may not show up on the view.

I would prefer something along these lines:

  class ProfilePresenter < ::Presenter
    def with_experience?
      profile.has_experience? && profile.experience_public?
    end
  end

  <% if user_profile.with_experience? %>
    <p><strong>Experience:</strong> <%= user_profile.experience %></p>
  <% end %>

as someone learning iOS development - thank you

one of the funniest websites i've ever visited, not to mention an awesome topic!

I believe most internet users would like to be anonymous in real life as well.

This post sounds like an attempt to settle an argument - some of the issues you mentioned should be settled as a team. A poorly settled "You're wrong and I'm right" argument might lead to bigger and more serious disagreements down the road.

If it were me... stop what you're doing and sign some papers. Friendships tend to break when dealing with the potential for making a lot of money. Is your relationship worth a million dollars? Maybe. What about a $100 million dollars? You're friendship isn't going to hold up if what you are forecasting is true. (I'm sure Zuck has 'lost' a lot of friends)

Without much other information on your company, here are some considerations:

If you don't get your % split, would you still be as motivated? work as hard? be as involved? What about your partner? How will it affect your business?

Your partner has crazy connections - how has that helped your business? How will it help your business in the future? How come you haven't raised money yet? If you don't raise money, how else does a VC play in your business?

He's put in $80k, why don't you just give him $80k for 100% of the company?

What if you just up and left, would the company be able to continue without you? (aka are you reasonably replaceable?) What if you just took the code and left?

How will all of this play out with the rest of the team?

Just some food for thought. Good luck!

PS. Unless your designer is doing front-end dev, I feel like you are overpaying your designer.

Thanks for the input! She's full time (though more like double full time) front-end engineer and designer. Designing both the web app and ios and android apps. Definitely worth it :)

This tutorial literally changed my life.

Props for making the best RoR tutorial available.

Thank you mhartl