Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's the power source for these buoys for transmission and reception? It doesn't look like there are any solar panels - so are they just running off of a battery that needs to be replaced periodically?


It's a battery pack with 84 D-cell alkaline batteries. Source:

http://tao.ndbc.noaa.gov/proj_overview/pubs/mil96paper.html

> "The board draws approximately 1 mW when in the sleep state, and around 250 mW when sampling sensors. The entire system averages 10 to 15 mW including power for all sensors, sampling, and Argos telemetry. By using switching power supplies where possible, the same battery space available in the original ATLAS tube will provide a conservative 18-month deployment life with a battery pack comprised of 84 D-cell alkaline batteries. The low power system allows the use of inexpensive batteries instead of solar cells or wind generators. These would attract vandals and add significantly to the acquisition and maintenance cost of each mooring."

This bouy is fascinating. It has a sub-surface set of sensors and check out the description of how those underwater sensors communicate with the main board of the bouy:

> "The sensors transmit and receive data from the buoy with an inductive coupling technique."

[...]

> "The tube drives the cable while the sensor drives the secondary coil on the inductive element. An FSK method of modulating the signal onto the cable is used with 2 kHz for a logic one, and 4 kHz for a logic zero. With a 2-kbaud data transfer rate, a one bit is 1 cycle and a zero bit is 2 cycles. By having data frequencies that are exact integers of the baud rate, the bits can be phase coherent at their edges, thus eliminating a source of jitter. The data uses standard ASCII hex format with one start and one stop bit."


I'm a little out of my depth, but is there a reason they don't use something like a sealed lead-acid marine battery, rather than a big pile of D-cells?


Lead acid has something like 1/4-1/3 the energy density, higher self-discharge rates, are more expensive, and are worse for the environment. The advantage is very high power density (nice for starting cars) and rechargeability, neither of which would be useful here.


Not a hardware engineer, but I'm going to wager that it has something to do with failure rates.

Modulo correct wiring, if you have a massive stack of D-cells and one dies, it's not a big deal. If your sole source of power dies, then you either have to send out a repair crew (expensive!) or have no data until the buoy is replaced on-schedule.


An interesting sidenote - Russians used to use RTGs for their buoys and lighthouses in remote places of the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-M




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: