Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In 2006 the linux desktop was about the same as it is now, the Windows one was better. In 2006 I didn't have a smartphone yet. And in 2016, I don't have one any more.

(Actually I have one from work, but I only seem to use it as a wireless hotspot.)



Vista was better than Windows 10?


Vista, I admit was terrible.

But XP was very good for its time -- it brought in the big menus and (quasi?) full-screen stuff which later metastasied in Win 10. Though those menus were also a throwback to the good old DOS text-mode menu systems.

Win7 was of course another good one, a few years later. But note: the difference between Win7 and Vista was not the UI design -- it was the performance and other aspects of technical execution.


Noone used vista, it was XP, 7, 10 for 90% of users.


Per the graphs at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_syste... it looks like Vista peaked at 40%.


Vista ran very well for me in 2 GB of RAM. It was absurdly slow in 1 GB machines, especially on laptops shipped with Vista plus bloatware.

I used Vista until 7 came out. I usually upgrade Windows versions rapidly. Linux too, I usually jump into the Fedora betas. I haven't been sorry yet.

Anyway, your own statement is contradictory. From what you said 10% is not "no one."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: