Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not debating the merits of MMR vaccines or arguing against vaccination. I'm not even making a statistical argument.

All I'm saying is that the decision of people who forgo vaccination is often a justified rational belief, even if it is incorrect. Keep in mind that most parents know a child with autism and very few know a child who died from MM or R.



How is it a justified, rational belief if incorrect?


While driving, it is rational and justified to believe that the vehicle's speed is 60mph when the speedometer reads "60mph." However, if the speedometer is miscalibrated your belief is incorrect.


It cannot be said that being anti-vaccine is a justified rational belief when it has an unjustified irrational basis. It is justified and rational to believe you're going 60mph when the speedometer says so because we all have experience with the reliability of speedometers, even though it's possible to be incorrect.

To use a different analogy, imagine I believed carpet was lava and stepping on it would burn me and break my mother's back. While this would explain why I'd avoid stepping on carpet, it would hardly be accurate to describe it as a justified, rational belief.


We have experience with the undesirable side affects of various medicines as well eg. Thalidomide and Fen-phen and even MMR (per the CDC).

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm#mmr




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: