Yeah rotation matrix are not hermitian (note that you don't need to show the eigenvalues aren't real, you just need to show it's not self-conjugate). The OP may have been confused by the fact that you can make a rotation matrix of eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix, which diagonalises the original matrix into two conjugate rotation matrices with a diagonal matrix between them.

D'oh you are correct! It's a bit late here. Anyways the rest of my point stands about the author's intent. To connect that to your original comment: a rotation is not "observable", instead, it's a transformation that modifies a physical system. In quantum mechanics, physical observables (energy, momentum, position, mass, etc) are always associated with Hermitian operators that act on the Hilbert space of states for the system.