Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

98% uptime is down roughly:

* 1 minute every hour, or

* 3h20 every week, or

* 1 week every year

I know about hyperbole for making a point, but does Basecamp really total anything like a week's downtime per year? If so, why? I'm pretty sure I've never had anything like that bad a number and equally that I wouldn't be happy using a service that did.

The general thrust is right: high reliability is expensive and you need to look at cost/benefit not chest-beating. But let's be honest about what we're actually aiming at.



This article is from 2005. It's quite likely that Basecamp's downtime was around a week per year. At that time, Rails was expected to have ~400 restarts a day[1] ;)

[1] http://www.loudthinking.com/posts/31-myth-2-rails-is-expecte...


Regular maintenance is enough to account for that.

Its really easy to hit 98% uptime (2% downtime). Just take your eyes off of your homegrown solution for a day.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: