Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is good to be skeptical of that "faster" and that 2% measurement, because there are lots of opportunities to make them ambiguous. But clock frequencies are hardly useful for comparisons between AMD and Intel. They'd be even more useless across architectures.

Benchmarks are as good as it gets. Aggregate benchmarks used for marketing slides are less than ideal, but the problem with marketing is that it has to apply to everyone. Better workload focused benchmarks might come out later... In their defense most people won't look at these, because most people don't really stress their CPUs anyway.



> most people don't really stress their CPUs anyway.

I find that Teams, Slack and VS Code running together stresses my 2019 Macbook Pro 16.


I agree, but it’s a weird measure to leave out when they advertise 16 “neural engine” cores.

Understanding the clock difference between the low energy and performance cores might be an interesting comparator, for example.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: