I hate to be negative but the title is misleading. There is no way any of this will appeal to people who hate math. A reader who 'hates math', implies that they have very little background in set theory and would be hard-pressed to define a Venn diagram. I am such a person and I couldn't get past the first definitions, although I tried. I need more background knowledge, and asking that I read a hefty Wikipedia article to get up to speed isn't going to cut it.
I'm sure the content is good, and for people who already know what the symbols mean, you've probably done a great job of making it meaningful but the title should be - 'Abstract algebra revisited for serious students of abstract algebra' or something like that.
Agreed. I understand what this article presented, but in no way was this any different or better than how this material was presented to me in college. At least in school I could go bug the professor after class to explain to me why I didn't get it.
I guess so. Basically, I wanted it to be for people who had learned SOME math in college, but had really hated the experience, and wanted something different.
I'm sure the content is good, and for people who already know what the symbols mean, you've probably done a great job of making it meaningful but the title should be - 'Abstract algebra revisited for serious students of abstract algebra' or something like that.