Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's actually quite clear. Much like printing money takes value away from savers, naked short selling takes value from existing stock holders.

  The lawsuit between Overstock and the banks concerned a phenomenon called 
  naked short-selling, a kind of high-finance counterfeiting that, especially 
  prior to the introduction of new regulations in 2008, short-sellers could 
  use to artificially depress the value of the stocks they’ve bet against.


Overstock's shareholders were not Goldman's clients. I want to know how the 'muppets' were harmed, as the article claims.

There is a story here, but this is not the author who's going to write it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: