They are not completely different things. The US war on drugs drives the Mexican drug war. Without the US as consumers, the situation in Mexico would be very different. While they are not exactly the same, it is not accurate to think of them as completely different things.
Yes of course things are linked. But javinskie's post makes it sound like the 55,000 deaths are the Mexican government's fault alone. While the Mexican government is no doubt not the most effective, the druglord themselves are massacring people. Whereas in the US, it is the government causing the most damage on its own, by overly incentivizing the incarceration of minor drug offenders. And it is this government over-enforcement that is the parallel to the copyright issue at heart. Not the near civil war in another country that is partly linked to it.
If marijuana and other drugs were legalized, there wouldn't be drug lords with private armies to begin with. They would disappear just like American mobsters at the end of Prohibition.
afterburner clearly understands this. His point is that in the US drug war, it is the government of the United States that is the main antagonist. This is not the case in with the ongoing violence in Mexico.
My point is that drug prohibition remains the root cause. Even in America, most of the actual harm is done by gangsters rather than the government. And yes, I'm aware that organized crime still exists in the United States, but not to nearly the same extent as during alcohol prohibition.
No they wouldn't, they'd still be there but in far less number. Legal weed is expensive, there will always be $20/8th alternatives out there from mexico to compete with $60/8th legal stuff.
It will be no different than it is in california. Adults buy the legal stuff, and unemployed people and highschool kids buy the mexican stuff.
