Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

100% coverage and useful tests aren't the same thing. Why are we still not aware of this?


I'm speaking in the context of building scaffolding for e2e testing, not the tests themselves.

When I say "everything" I mean the frontend, backend, database, seeded data, optimizing runtime etc, I'm not talking about loc coverage. I would not recommend using llms to generate the tests themselves without heavy guidance and review, and you're right that 100% coverage is often a counterproductive goal if the code under test is anything less than pure business logic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: